Skip to content

Managerial turnover in primary care clinics

icpsr_188681

Samuel Cole, Duha T. Altindag (2023). Economic Inquiry

DOI: 10.1111/ecin.13160

field value
venue Economic Inquiry
discipline public_health
paper 10.1111/ecin.13160
replication data openICPSR 188681
data license CC BY 4.0 (openICPSR project page 188681 (maintainer-read 2026-07-20)) — “This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.”
regression datasets (in this corpus) 4
graduated / eligible / exported 4 / 6 / 80 (policy claims_manual_regression_cap)
routed / gap / residue (at source) 22 / 21 / 0

Claims & tasks

Every claim the paper makes in its main body about a parameter, joined to the benchmark task (dataset · coefficient) that captures it. The effect, s.e. and p are the captured regression's own reported values (the paper's Stata figures, carrying the paper's SE method); the row shows the paper's verbatim quote (page · exhibit), so you can confirm the regression matches what the paper says. The prominence column is the within-study inclusion signal (⭐ headline → primary → secondary). The sensitivity column is the privacy level of the most-sensitive variable in the regression (🔴 high / 🟠 medium / ⚪ low).

# prominence sensitivity claim effect s.e. p task instance (dataset · coef)
C1 ⭐ primary 🔴 high “This result implies that a $1,000,000 increase in profits above zero decreases an administrator's risk of losing her/his job by one percentage point (4% relative to the mean of the outcome).” — p. 13
“Specifically, the coefficient of Prof itþ is −0.010, and it is statistically different from zero.” — p. 13
“Mainly, consistent with the non‐profit nature of these clinics, while large positive profits reduce the risk of job loss, losses do not have an effect on the probability of remaining employed.” — p. 13
Table 5, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
-0.010 0.004 0.032 Linear Regression reg_13 · Positive_prof
n=13131 · d=35
C2 ⭐ primary 🔴 high “On the other hand, a $1 million increase in losses below zero does not significantly affect their chance of future employment as clinic administrators.” — p. 2
“Mainly, consistent with the non‐profit nature of these clinics, while large positive profits reduce the risk of job loss, losses do not have an effect on the probability of remaining employed.” — p. 13
“On the contrary, the coefficient for Prof it− , which represents the marginal effect of each additional dollar lost, is small and not statistically different from zero.” — p. 13
Table 5, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
+0.001 0.003 0.684 Linear Regression reg_13 · Negative_prof
n=13131 · d=35
C3 ⭐ primary 🔴 high “They show that for each $1 million increase in profit (about 40% of a standard deviation), the administrator's probability of losing her/his job in the next period decreases by 0.5 percentage points.” — p. 10
“This effect corresponds to an increase of roughly 2% relative to the mean level of the outcome (26 percentage points).” — p. 10
“Specifically, holding constant the extent of a clinic's healthcare provision and a proxy for the quality of its services, a $1 million increase in its profits reduces the probability that its administrator will be replaced in the next year by about 2% relative to the mean level of administrator dismissal.” — p. 2
Table 4, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
-0.005 0.002 0.021 Linear Regression reg_9__1 · real_profit
n=13131 · d=34
C4 ⭐ primary 🔴 high “We find that, compared to the years when a clinic had zero or negative profits, its administrator's probability of losing her/his job decreases by 2.5 percentage points when their clinic generates positive profits, nearly 10% relative to the mean level of the outcome.” — p. 10
“We show that a $1 million increase in profit above zero promotes the administrator's chance of being retained by about 4%.” — p. 2
Table 4, col 2 (Outcome: Job loss next year (2))
-0.025 0.012 0.034 Linear Regression reg_9__2 · 1.gain
n=13131 · d=34
C5 ⭐ primary 🔴 high “A one standard deviation increase in clinic profit decreases the probability of job loss by 1.4 percentage points (5% of the average of the outcome).” — p. 10
“A standard deviation increase in profit ($2.49 million) translates to greater than a 5% reduction in an administrator's chance of job loss, relative to the mean level of administrator dismissal.” — p. 19
Table 4, col 3 (Outcome: Job loss next year (3))
-0.014 0.006 0.021 Linear Regression reg_9__3 · standard_prof2
n=13131 · d=34
C6 secondary 🔴 high Coefficients for the quantity of care provided demonstrate the expected negative relationship with job loss, though these effects are not statistically significant.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
-0.003 0.002 0.284 Linear Regression reg_9__1 · visits
n=13131 · d=34
C7 secondary 🔴 high Results indicate that a one standard deviation increase in our quality measure corresponds to a 1.1 percentage point reduction in the chance of job loss in the next period.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
-0.011 0.004 0.011 Linear Regression reg_9__1 · QUALITY2
n=13131 · d=34
C8 secondary 🔴 high Each additional year of work in the clinic as a manager increases the probability of job loss by 1.6 percentage points.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
+0.016 0.005 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__1 · experience
n=13131 · d=34
C9 secondary 🔴 high The coefficient of Imminent/Recent Ownership Change is 0.049, which implies clinic managers are more likely to be replaced around the time that their clinics are acquired.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 1 (Outcome: Job loss next year (1))
+0.049 0.015 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__1 · recent_parent_change
n=13131 · d=34
C10 secondary 🔴 high Coefficients for the quantity of care provided demonstrate the expected negative relationship with job loss, though these effects are not statistically significant.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 2 (Outcome: Job loss next year (2))
-0.004 0.002 0.136 Linear Regression reg_9__2 · visits
n=13131 · d=34
C11 secondary 🔴 high Results indicate that a one standard deviation increase in our quality measure corresponds to a 1.1 percentage point reduction in the chance of job loss in the next period.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 2 (Outcome: Job loss next year (2))
-0.011 0.004 0.010 Linear Regression reg_9__2 · QUALITY2
n=13131 · d=34
C12 secondary 🔴 high Each additional year of work in the clinic as a manager increases the probability of job loss by 1.6 percentage points.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 2 (Outcome: Job loss next year (2))
+0.016 0.005 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__2 · experience
n=13131 · d=34
C13 secondary 🔴 high The coefficient of Imminent/Recent Ownership Change is 0.049, which implies clinic managers are more likely to be replaced around the time that their clinics are acquired.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 2 (Outcome: Job loss next year (2))
+0.049 0.015 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__2 · recent_parent_change
n=13131 · d=34
C14 secondary 🔴 high Coefficients for the quantity of care provided demonstrate the expected negative relationship with job loss, though these effects are not statistically significant.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 3 (Outcome: Job loss next year (3))
-0.003 0.002 0.284 Linear Regression reg_9__3 · visits
n=13131 · d=34
C15 secondary 🔴 high Results indicate that a one standard deviation increase in our quality measure corresponds to a 1.1 percentage point reduction in the chance of job loss in the next period.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 3 (Outcome: Job loss next year (3))
-0.011 0.004 0.011 Linear Regression reg_9__3 · QUALITY2
n=13131 · d=34
C16 secondary 🔴 high Each additional year of work in the clinic as a manager increases the probability of job loss by 1.6 percentage points.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 3 (Outcome: Job loss next year (3))
+0.016 0.005 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__3 · experience
n=13131 · d=34
C17 secondary 🔴 high The coefficient of Imminent/Recent Ownership Change is 0.049, which implies clinic managers are more likely to be replaced around the time that their clinics are acquired.
p. 10 · Table 4, col 3 (Outcome: Job loss next year (3))
+0.049 0.015 0.001 Linear Regression reg_9__3 · recent_parent_change
n=13131 · d=34

Regression datasets

The 4 regression dataset(s) graduated into the benchmark corpus from this study's replication package — each backs one or more claims above. Expand each for its features, response, (sound, data-independent) public bounds, and reproduction grade.

icpsr_188681_reg_13 — job_loss ~ Positive_prof + Negative_prof + visits + QUALITY2 + 1.female + 1.minority + MD…

Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually). Reproduction grade:match (benchmark-eligible).

Features

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
Positive_prof Clinic profit amount when positive (gain) continuous ⚪ low -0.009503 0.00443
Negative_prof Clinic profit amount when negative (loss) continuous ⚪ low +0.00115 0.00282
visits Number of clinic patient visits continuous ⚪ low -0.002116 0.00242
QUALITY2 Clinic quality measure/index continuous ⚪ low -0.01096 0.00427
1.female Administrator gender (female) indicator categorical 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.004168 0.0195
1.minority Administrator race/ethnicity minority indicator categorical 🔴 high -1.0 1.0 +0.03084 0.0192
MD2 Administrator holds MD/physician credential indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.006623 0.0303
experience Administrator's years of work experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.01586 0.00494
experience_square Squared years of administrator experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0004391 0.00035
number_clinics_within_proximity Count of nearby competing clinics continuous ⚪ low -0.00654 0.00526
employees Number of clinic employees continuous ⚪ low -0.0007537 0.0114
population County population count continuous ⚪ low -0.04205 0.0361
county_med_hh_income County median household income continuous ⚪ low +0.001655 0.00156
unemployment_rate_in_county County unemployment rate continuous ⚪ low -100.0 100.0 -0.007991 0.00759
free_clinic Clinic operates as free clinic indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02423 0.0604
recent_parent_change Recent/imminent clinic ownership change indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.04832 0.0151
parent Clinic has parent ownership organization indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 -0.04231 0.0211
Rural Clinic located in rural area indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02536 0.0562
2.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low +0.02635 0.0315
3.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low -0.003828 0.0334
2003.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2506 0.0254
2004.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2697 0.0274
2005.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2321 0.0313
2006.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.255 0.0343
2007.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2594 0.0349
2008.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2349 0.0376
2009.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2314 0.0516
2010.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2022 0.0577
2011.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2045 0.0545
2012.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2249 0.0485
2013.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.1822 0.044
2014.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2257 0.0435
2015.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2728 0.0439
2016.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2422 0.048
2017.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2407 0.053

Response

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
job_loss Administrator lost job next period indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0

Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; binary indicator; employment/labour outcome; binary indicator; facility location, not person; binary indicator; facility not person; binary indicator; facility ownership event not person; binary indicator; facility ownership status not person; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification; plausible generic calendar year range; wave/time indicator; rate typically expressed as a percentage; county-level, not person.

n = 13,131 samples.

icpsr_188681_reg_9__1 — job_loss ~ real_profit + visits + QUALITY2 + 1.female + 1.minority + MD2 + experience + e…

Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually). Reproduction grade:match (benchmark-eligible).

Features

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
real_profit Clinic real profit in dollars continuous ⚪ low -0.00505 0.00219
visits Number of clinic patient visits continuous ⚪ low -0.002611 0.00244
QUALITY2 Clinic quality measure/index continuous ⚪ low -0.01081 0.00427
1.female Administrator gender (female) indicator categorical 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.004178 0.0195
1.minority Administrator race/ethnicity minority indicator categorical 🔴 high -1.0 1.0 +0.03078 0.0191
MD2 Administrator holds MD/physician credential indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.006826 0.0303
experience Administrator's years of work experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0159 0.00494
experience_square Squared years of administrator experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0004435 0.00035
number_clinics_within_proximity Count of nearby competing clinics continuous ⚪ low -0.00669 0.00524
employees Number of clinic employees continuous ⚪ low -0.008043 0.0103
population County population count continuous ⚪ low -0.04179 0.0359
county_med_hh_income County median household income continuous ⚪ low +0.001616 0.00157
unemployment_rate_in_county County unemployment rate continuous ⚪ low -100.0 100.0 -0.008014 0.00758
free_clinic Clinic operates as free clinic indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02366 0.0604
recent_parent_change Recent/imminent clinic ownership change indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.04877 0.015
parent Clinic has parent ownership organization indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 -0.04206 0.021
Rural Clinic located in rural area indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02582 0.0563
2.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low +0.02611 0.0316
3.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low -0.004018 0.0334
2003.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2509 0.0254
2004.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2699 0.0274
2005.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2323 0.0313
2006.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.255 0.0343
2007.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2593 0.0349
2008.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2349 0.0376
2009.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2314 0.0516
2010.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2022 0.0577
2011.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2046 0.0545
2012.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2252 0.0485
2013.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.1828 0.044
2014.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2265 0.0435
2015.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2738 0.0439
2016.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2438 0.0481
2017.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2424 0.0531

Response

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
job_loss Administrator lost job next period indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0

Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; binary indicator; employment/labour outcome; binary indicator; facility location, not person; binary indicator; facility not person; binary indicator; facility ownership event not person; binary indicator; facility ownership status not person; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification; plausible generic calendar year range; wave/time indicator; rate typically expressed as a percentage; county-level, not person.

n = 13,131 samples.

icpsr_188681_reg_9__2 — job_loss ~ 1.gain + visits + QUALITY2 + 1.female + 1.minority + MD2 + experience + experi…

Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually). Reproduction grade:match (benchmark-eligible).

Features

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
1.gain Clinic had positive profit indicator categorical ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 -0.02488 0.0117
visits Number of clinic patient visits continuous ⚪ low -0.0036 0.00241
QUALITY2 Clinic quality measure/index continuous ⚪ low -0.01103 0.00428
1.female Administrator gender (female) indicator categorical 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.003654 0.0194
1.minority Administrator race/ethnicity minority indicator categorical 🔴 high -1.0 1.0 +0.02973 0.0191
MD2 Administrator holds MD/physician credential indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.008039 0.0302
experience Administrator's years of work experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.01616 0.00497
experience_square Squared years of administrator experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0004297 0.000351
number_clinics_within_proximity Count of nearby competing clinics continuous ⚪ low -0.00694 0.00519
employees Number of clinic employees continuous ⚪ low +0.0002773 0.00916
population County population count continuous ⚪ low -0.04623 0.0376
county_med_hh_income County median household income continuous ⚪ low +0.001642 0.00157
unemployment_rate_in_county County unemployment rate continuous ⚪ low -100.0 100.0 -0.008006 0.00759
free_clinic Clinic operates as free clinic indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02564 0.0603
recent_parent_change Recent/imminent clinic ownership change indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.04903 0.015
parent Clinic has parent ownership organization indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 -0.04255 0.0209
Rural Clinic located in rural area indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02359 0.0559
2.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low +0.02776 0.0315
3.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low -0.004422 0.0334
2003.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2506 0.0254
2004.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2701 0.0274
2005.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2325 0.0313
2006.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.255 0.0343
2007.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2585 0.0349
2008.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2344 0.0376
2009.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2307 0.0516
2010.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2019 0.0577
2011.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.204 0.0545
2012.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2255 0.0486
2013.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.1832 0.0441
2014.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2259 0.0435
2015.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2736 0.0439
2016.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2441 0.048
2017.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2435 0.0529

Response

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
job_loss Administrator lost job next period indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0

Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; binary indicator; employment/labour outcome; binary indicator; facility location, not person; binary indicator; facility not person; binary indicator; facility ownership event not person; binary indicator; facility ownership status not person; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification; plausible generic calendar year range; wave/time indicator; rate typically expressed as a percentage; county-level, not person.

n = 13,131 samples.

icpsr_188681_reg_9__3 — job_loss ~ standard_prof2 + visits + QUALITY2 + 1.female + 1.minority + MD2 + experience …

Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually). Reproduction grade:match (benchmark-eligible).

Features

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
standard_prof2 Standardized (z-score) clinic profit continuous ⚪ low -0.01355 0.00589
visits Number of clinic patient visits continuous ⚪ low -0.002611 0.00244
QUALITY2 Clinic quality measure/index continuous ⚪ low -0.01081 0.00427
1.female Administrator gender (female) indicator categorical 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.004178 0.0195
1.minority Administrator race/ethnicity minority indicator categorical 🔴 high -1.0 1.0 +0.03078 0.0191
MD2 Administrator holds MD/physician credential indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0 +0.006826 0.0303
experience Administrator's years of work experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0159 0.00494
experience_square Squared years of administrator experience continuous 🟠 medium +0.0004435 0.00035
number_clinics_within_proximity Count of nearby competing clinics continuous ⚪ low -0.00669 0.00524
employees Number of clinic employees continuous ⚪ low -0.008043 0.0103
population County population count continuous ⚪ low -0.04179 0.0359
county_med_hh_income County median household income continuous ⚪ low +0.001616 0.00157
unemployment_rate_in_county County unemployment rate continuous ⚪ low -100.0 100.0 -0.008014 0.00758
free_clinic Clinic operates as free clinic indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02366 0.0604
recent_parent_change Recent/imminent clinic ownership change indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.04877 0.015
parent Clinic has parent ownership organization indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 -0.04206 0.021
Rural Clinic located in rural area indicator continuous ⚪ low -1.0 1.0 +0.02582 0.0563
2.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low +0.02611 0.0316
3.Clin_fqhc_or_like Clinic type category (FQHC or similar) categorical ⚪ low -0.004018 0.0334
2003.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2509 0.0254
2004.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2699 0.0274
2005.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2323 0.0313
2006.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.255 0.0343
2007.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2593 0.0349
2008.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2349 0.0376
2009.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2314 0.0516
2010.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2022 0.0577
2011.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2046 0.0545
2012.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2252 0.0485
2013.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.1828 0.044
2014.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2265 0.0435
2015.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2738 0.0439
2016.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2438 0.0481
2017.year Calendar year fixed effect categorical ⚪ low -200.0 200.0 -0.2424 0.0531

Response

name description type sensitivity bound lo bound hi estimate s.e.
job_loss Administrator lost job next period indicator continuous 🟠 medium -1.0 1.0

Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; binary indicator; employment/labour outcome; binary indicator; facility location, not person; binary indicator; facility not person; binary indicator; facility ownership event not person; binary indicator; facility ownership status not person; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification; plausible generic calendar year range; wave/time indicator; rate typically expressed as a percentage; county-level, not person.

n = 13,131 samples.