Can High School Counselors Help the Economics Pipeline?
icpsr_189563
Melissa Gentry, Jonathan Meer, Danila Serra (2023). AEA Papers and Proceedings
| field | value |
|---|---|
| venue | AEA Papers and Proceedings |
| paper | https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20231121 |
| replication data | openICPSR 189563 |
| data license | CC BY 4.0 (openICPSR project page 189563 (maintainer-read 2026-07-20)) — “This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.” |
| regression datasets (in this corpus) | 2 |
| graduated / eligible / exported | 2 / 11 / 24 (policy claims_manual_regression_cap) |
| routed / gap / residue (at source) | 11 / 0 / 0 |
Claims & tasks
Every claim the paper makes in its main body about a parameter, joined to the benchmark task (dataset · coefficient) that captures it. The effect, s.e. and p are the captured regression's own reported values (the paper's Stata figures, carrying the paper's SE method); the row shows the paper's verbatim quote (page · exhibit), so you can confirm the regression matches what the paper says. The prominence column is the within-study inclusion signal (⭐ headline → primary → secondary). The sensitivity column is the privacy level of the most-sensitive variable in the regression (🔴 high / 🟠 medium / ⚪ low).
| # | prominence | sensitivity | claim | effect | s.e. | p | task | instance (dataset · coef) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | ⭐ primary | 🔴 high | “The results show that the likelihood of a high-achieving student selecting economics on their application increased by 2.6 percentage points for all such students (a 33 percent increase), by 2.9 percentage points (46 percent) for women, and by 4.7 percentage points (66 percent) for URM students.” — p. 4 “For this group, we see an economically and statistically meaningful increase in student interest in the economics major.” — p. 4 Table 2, col 5 (All top (5)) |
+0.026 | 0.011 | 0.015 | Linear Regression | reg_5 · workshop_2020n=14107 · d=4 |
| C2 | primary | 🔴 high | These coefficients are very small and not statistically significant. p. 4 · Table 2, col 1 (All (1)) |
+0.002 | 0.006 | 0.684 | Linear Regression | reg_1 · workshop_2020n=42442 · d=5 |
Regression datasets
The 2 regression dataset(s) graduated into the benchmark corpus from this study's replication package — each backs one or more claims above. Expand each for its features, response, (sound, data-independent) public bounds, and reproduction grade.
icpsr_189563_reg_1 — original_econ ~ workshop_2020 + yr_2020 + female + URM + top_perform
Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually).
Reproduction grade: ✅ match (benchmark-eligible).
Features
| name | description | type | sensitivity | bound lo | bound hi | estimate | s.e. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
workshop_2020 |
Received counselor economics workshop treatment | continuous | ⚪ low | -1.0 | 1.0 | +0.002394 | 0.00587 |
yr_2020 |
Application year 2020 cohort indicator | continuous | ⚪ low | -1.0 | 1.0 | +0.003119 | 0.0042 |
female |
Student gender indicator (female) | continuous | 🟠 medium | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.04945 | 0.00382 |
URM |
Underrepresented minority race/ethnicity status | continuous | 🔴 high | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.007725 | 0.00316 |
top_perform |
High-achieving/top-performing applicant indicator | continuous | 🟠 medium | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.0005348 | 0.003 |
Response
| name | description | type | sensitivity | bound lo | bound hi | estimate | s.e. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
original_econ |
Selected economics as intended major | continuous | 🟠 medium | -1.0 | 1.0 | — | — |
Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; academic major choice is education-related; binary indicator; based on academic performance/test scores; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification is high sensitivity; binary indicator; sex/gender is medium sensitivity; binary indicator; treatment/arm variable; binary indicator; wave/round/time variable.
n = 42,442 samples.
icpsr_189563_reg_5 — original_econ ~ workshop_2020 + yr_2020 + female + URM
Sensitivity proposal: 🔴 high maximum across columns (advisory; reviewed manually).
Reproduction grade: ✅ match (benchmark-eligible).
Features
| name | description | type | sensitivity | bound lo | bound hi | estimate | s.e. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
workshop_2020 |
Received counselor economics workshop treatment | continuous | ⚪ low | -1.0 | 1.0 | +0.02578 | 0.0105 |
yr_2020 |
Application year 2020 cohort indicator | continuous | ⚪ low | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.00621 | 0.00767 |
female |
Student gender indicator (female) | continuous | 🟠 medium | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.0378 | 0.00619 |
URM |
Underrepresented minority race/ethnicity status | continuous | 🔴 high | -1.0 | 1.0 | -0.01445 | 0.00703 |
Response
| name | description | type | sensitivity | bound lo | bound hi | estimate | s.e. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
original_econ |
Selected economics as intended major | continuous | 🟠 medium | -1.0 | 1.0 | — | — |
Public bounds (data-independent) sourced from: binary indicator; academic major choice is education-related; binary indicator; race/ethnicity classification is high sensitivity; binary indicator; sex/gender is medium sensitivity; binary indicator; treatment/arm variable; binary indicator; wave/round/time variable.
n = 14,107 samples.